Below are two lengthy Sections from the Interlocal Agreement between PSTA and Pinellas County that was approved at the June PSTA Board of Directors meeting.
SECTION
7. PLEDGE OF SURTAX NET PROCEEDS.
(A)
In order to
finance or refinance
projects, PSTA may
issue bonds or
notes, enter into
lines of credit,
incur loans or
other indebtedness, enter
into concession, lease
or similar agreements,
and may secure
payment obligations under
such bonds, loans,
notes, lines of
credit or other
indebtedness or pursuant
to such concession,
lease or similar
agreements with a
pledge of and
lien on the
Surtax Net Proceeds
in accordance with
the provisions of Section
212.055(1), Florida Statutes,
and other applicable
law, including any
indebtedness refinancing such
bonds, loans, notes,
lines of credit
or other indebtedness.
Prior to the
initial issuance of
any indebtedness by
PSTA, the Pinellas
County Attorney shall
approve the trust
agreement or trust
indenture (the "Trust
Agreement") pursuant to
which such indebtedness
is to be
issued. The County
and PSTA agree
that it is
their intent that
such approval be
provided by the
County Attorney prior
to the date
of the Surtax
Referendum. Notwithstanding the
foregoing, PSTA shall
at all times
comply with its
debt policy referred
to in Section
10 hereof.
(B)
Notwithstanding anything herein
to the contrary,
to the extent
permitted by law,
in order to
effectuate the purposes
in PSTA's Greenlight
Plan, PSTA may
enter into leases
or public private
partnerships with concessionaires, and
may secure its
obligations to make
lease, concession and
other payments under
lease and concession
agreements with a
pledge of and
lien on the Surtax Net
Proceeds in accordance
with the provisions
of Section 212.055(1
), Florida Statutes.
(C) Nothing contained
herein shall be
construed to limit
the amount of
indebtedness that may
be incurred by
PSTA to be
secured by the
Surtax Net Proceeds.
Comment
This Section provides
the authority for the PSTA to obligate sales tax proceeds to the payment of
bonds issued by PSTA. Once obligated, these funds cannot be reduced or used for
any other purpose by PSTA or the County. The bond covenants will determine how
the money is to be spent, and while the County may have some say in the
structuring of the bonds, PSTA will really be in the driver's seat, because
they will actually be spending the bond proceeds with limited County over
sight.
We have already seen
how liberally PSTA interprets rules related to spending money.
Upon the earlier
of:
(A) completion of
all steps to
finance (including without
limitation debt incurrence,
and/or execution of
public-private partnerships or
leases), acquire, and/or construct
all projects and
capital improvements contemplated
in PSTA's Greenlight
Plan, as mutually
determined by PSTA
and the County
(if the parties
cannot mutually determine
whether PSTA's Greenlight
Plan has been
completed, the parties
shall engage a
nationally recognized transit
consultant acceptable to
both Parties to
make such determination);
(B)
PSTA's decision to
discontinue such steps
to finance, acquire
and/or construct substantially
all of the
projects and capital
improvements contemplated in
PSTA's Greenlight Plan;
(C)
the occurrence of a
Force Majeure;
(D)
the fiftieth 50th
anniversary of the
date the Surtax
is first levied
and each 20th
anniversary thereafter;
(E)
a payment default under
the Trust Agreement;
or
(F)
PSTA applying Surtax
Net Proceeds for
a purpose other
than PSTA's Greenlight
Plan,
the
County and PSTA
shall meet to
discuss the particular
event described in
clauses (A) through
(F) that has
occurred and shall
consider, depending upon
the event, revising
this Agreement, revising
or adding to
PSTA's Greenlight Plan,
seeking further authorization
for additional uses
by PSTA of
the Surtax Net
Proceeds or reducing
or increasing, if
there has been
a previous reduction
and subject to
the limitations of
the Surtax Referendum, temporarily
or permanently, the
Surtax Net Proceeds.
If the Parties
are unable to
agree on what
action, if any,
to take, after
making a good
faith effort, the
County may take
any legally required
action to reduce
the Surtax Net
Proceeds distributed to
PSTA. In determining
what action to
take, if any,
pursuant to this
Section 9, the
Parties shall comply
with the provisions
of Section 29(B)
hereof.
Any
reduction of Surtax
Net Proceeds distributed
to PSTA as
a result of
an action or
event described in
clauses (C), (E)
or (F) above
shall be temporary
and the County
shall promptly begin
distributing the full
amount of the
Surtax Net Proceeds
to PSTA, including
all amounts that
were held back
and actual interest
earnings, if any,
actually derived by
the County, when
the County determines,
in its sole discretion,
that such event
or action has
been cured or
no longer exists.
The foregoing shall
not impose a
duty on the
County to invest
any of such
withheld amounts. The
County shall determine,
in its sole discretion,
whether any reduction
of Surtax Net
Proceeds distributed to
PSTA as a
result of an
action or event
described in clauses
6 (A), (B)
or (D) will
be temporary or
permanent. If the
County determines to
permanently reduce the
distribution of the
Surtax Net Proceeds,
to the extent
and as permitted
by law, it
may take such
action as it
deems necessary and
is legally required
to reduce the
amount of the
Surtax levy in
accordance with this
Section. Notwithstanding anything
in this Section
9 to the
contrary, any temporary
reduction shall be
limited to an
amount that will
not impair PSTA's
ability to meet
all of its
then outstanding financial
obligations under the
Trust Agreement.
Comment
This Section sets up
the conditions under which the sales tax would terminate. Note that (D) sets the life expectancy of
Greenlight at 50 years but allows for two 20 year extensions.
That's 90 Years!
TWO generations.
A baby born on
January 1, 2015 when this Tax starts, will pay the tax their entire life, their
children will pay it and it is not inconceivable their grand children may also
pay it.
This amount of
indebtedness for this length of time to develop 24 four rail stations for a
train generally going to the wrong places; buying and selling a bunch of land
and building tracks and buildings so a very few can get very rich is very, very
wrong.
The law you are being
asked to approve with your YES vote is just over 5000 words long. The
Interlocal Agreement where the County attempts to put some control on PSTA is
over 7000 words long. And we have just begun.
Don't mortgage your
future, your children's future and grandchildren's future for a train that does
not meet the core public transportation need and will cost millions more than
the Greenlight plan contemplates.
Send the County,
PSTA, TBARTA and Greenlight back to drawing board just like they did in Hillsborough
County.
Greenlight is a plan
that we don't need and cannot afford.
Vote NO November 4
Talk to you fiends and neighbors and be sure
they know what they are voting for.
It's not public
transportation. It's all about the money.
E-mail
Doc at: dr.webb@verizon.net. Or
send me a Facebook (Gene Webb) Friend request. Please comment below, and be
sure to share on Facebook and Twitter.
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks
Disclosures: Contributor to No Tax for Tracks
No comments:
Post a Comment