Pages

Thursday, September 20, 2018

The Grossly Cynical, Hypocritical Campaign of Janet Cruz

Cross post with permission of Jim Bleyer, Tampa Bay Beat

When State Rep. Janet Cruz jumped into a Florida Senate race against incumbent Republican Dana Young, she told Tampa voters she was motivated to run because of the February school shootings in Parkland.
The term-limited House minority leader had previously filed to run for a seat on the Hillsborough County Commission.
Her (in)action during the 2018 legislative session screams the ultimate hypocrisy.


Within three weeks of the Parkland shooting, Florida’s Legislature and conservative governor had done something Republicans had resisted for more than 20 years: they voted to defy the National Rifle Association.
Legislators, including Young, who had sworn allegiance to the Second Amendment voted to raise the age to purchase a rifle from 18 to 21, extend the waiting period for all gun purchases, and ban bump stocks. But they also used the tragedy to patch together a plan to address weaknesses in the mental health and school security safety nets, budgeting $400 million to accomplish that.
While the House debated the proposal, parents who lost children at Stoneman Douglas lobbied the governor, lawmakers and the media to get the bill approved, saying, “There is enough good in the middle of this bill that everyone can agree on.”
Despite the pleas of Parkland parents to pass the legislation as a first step, Cruz and all but nine of the House Democrats voted no on the measure. Young, on the other hand, heeded the aggrieved parents and voted for the compromise.
Gun control advocates deemed the legislation a definite improvement though falling short of a ban on assault weapons that have been used in most recent mass killings. For the NRA, it was an unconstitutional abridging of the rights of law-abiding gun owners. Moments after the bill became law, the NRA’s Washington lawyers filed a federal lawsuit.
Then there is Cruz’ alliance with Tampa Mayor Bob Buckhorn who mused publicly about killing journalists as he fired blanks from a machine gun turret on a navy vessel.
Buckhorn’s  remarks were widely circulated in the national media.  Buckhorn’s hate-fueled rhetoric made headlines in the Washington Postthe Washington TimesCNN, and Raw Story.
A year later a crazed shooter massacred five newsroom workers at the Annapolis Capital Gazette.
But Buckhorn, who boasted he would relish being the triggerman  mowing down journalists is a major patron behind Cruz, the politico that was so moved by the Parkland shooting.
Cruz still uses the massacre of 17 students at  Stoneman Douglas as the reason for her decision to try and remain in the legislature.
Cruz has disappointed fellow Democrats on other fronts as well.
She accepted campaign contributions from a well-known predatory lender that victimizes a significant portion of her constituency.
Cruz alienated an influential segment of her own party when she conspired with failed gubernatorial and Congressional candidate Alex Sink to shove progressive favorite Bob Buesing out of the race.
Sink used the carrot and stick approach with Buesing: no support from the state Democratic Party if he remained in the race, but a possible appointment (with a Democratic governor) if he bowed out.
The punchline: an appointment possibility was viable as long as one of the Party ‘s handpicked choices — Gwen Graham or Phil Levine — won the primary. Both are sitting at home musing about “what ifs.”
Then there was the ultimate insult to Cruz.
During the first Democratic gubernatorial debate, candidate Phil Levine could not identify Cruz as the outgoing minority leader of the Florida House.  Her undistinguished record may have something to do with that knowledge gap.

No comments:

Post a Comment